The Joke that is Called "Conservapedia"
Victor Reppert posted an article from Conservapedia that purports to highlight the hypocrisy of atheists. This reminded me of how patently ridiculous Conservapedia is. It's not that I think there is no hypocrisy among atheists. But the articles there are so blatantly biased that it's difficult to see how anybody could take it seriously for any purpose at all. In particular, I find it stunning that Victor Reppert, a philosopher with a PhD, would even consider making this the topic of a post on his blog "to generate some discussion".
To be fair, Victor says that he does not agree with all of what they say. Which raises the question: How much of this crap does he agree with?